Dear Near and Dear Readers,
Mental Health Awareness Month has helped bring important conversations into the open. More people today feel comfortable discussing anxiety, depression, ADHD, trauma, and emotional struggles than perhaps ever before.
In many ways, this is progress.

When we have language for what is happening for us, an explanation can reduce shame.
A diagnosis can often provide relief and a map for what is going on inside. It can truly help people feel seen, understood, and less alone.
The concern here is that things have begun to blur:
A diagnosis is meant to describe patterns of experience. It is not meant to become the totality of a person’s identity. And yet increasingly, many people no longer say:
“I struggle with anxiety.” They said “I am an anxious person.” Instead of saying they have symptoms that align or look like ADHD, they said “I am neurodivergent.”
At first, this may seem harmless or even empowering and don’t get me wrong, I think it can be to some extent very helpful. The difference is I am interested in naming an experience in order to bring validation and clarity. However, there can also be a subtle psychological shift that occurs when a clinical description moves from something a person experiences to something a person fundamentally believes themselves to be.
This distinction matters more than many realize.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was designed as a clinical tool. Its purpose is to help clinicians, that’s right, professionals, to identify clusters of symptoms, guide treatment planning, facilitate communication between providers, and support research.
The Problem with “I Am”
It was never intended to function as a blueprint for identity, or short hand so you can tell someone who you are. The bigger danger, is they may have a different definition of the label than you do.
In my practice, I integrate NVC (Nonviolent Communication). Marshall Rosenberg, the founder of NVC, would call this “life-alienating language.” Telling yourself you are something rather than experiencing something is superficial; it doesn’t get to the heart of what is really happening. It not only alienates you from others but also yourself.
Furthermore, using these labels as shorthand allows others to misinterpret you based on their own definitions. “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” Inconceivable? Not really. We assume it’s just shorthand, but we must ask: what is the actual cost to our internal world when we continue to speak this way about ourselves and others?
A diagnosis describes tendencies, struggles, patterns, symptoms or vulnerabilities. Fact is, human beings are far more dynamic than diagnostic categories because people change, adapt, people mature and people heal. This means how they see themselves will change. That original label may no longer apply.
No DSM label, or any label really can fully capture a person’s history, capacity for creativity and relationships, how defenses show up, how strengths develop and the layers of controdictions, unconscious motivations and values layered into the complex human being.
Bottom line, the map is not the terrain.

It’s Human to Label
Psychologically speaking, labels can provide something deeply human:
coherence. Human beings naturally seek explanation and meaning. When someone has spent years feeling different, overwhelmed, emotionally reactive, scattered, ashamed, or misunderstood, finally receiving language for those experiences can feel profoundly relieving. Sometimes a diagnosis answers questions people have carried for decades:
“Why do relationships feel harder for me?”
“Why do I react this way?”
“Why have I always struggled with this?”
That relief matters and the problem is not diagnosis but the use of it as an explanation or short hand to explain who you are and what you need and why. This can slowly hardens into self limiting beliefs.
When a diagnosis becomes fused with identity, the psyche can begin unconsciously organizing around it. This can happen in subtle ways including interpreting every behavior through the label (both yourself and anyone you’ve told you are X label), reducing complexity into symptom language that can lead to interpersonal conflict when one person thinks one thing and other some thing different about the same label. People for years have feared that being label comes with others expecting limitation in them instead of possibility. Finally, we run the risk of forming relationships around shared pathology rather than shared humanity. Over time, curiosity about the self can narrow.
Instead of asking:
“What happened to me?”
“What do I need?”
“What patterns developed around stress, attachment, or survival?”
“What strengths exist alongside these struggles?”

The internal dialogue can become:
“Well… that’s just my ADHD.”
“That’s my anxiety.”
“That’s my trauma.”
In some cases, labels that initially reduced shame can unintentionally begin reinforcing hopelessness, rigidity, or over-identification. The problem begins when explanation slowly hardens into limitation. As Nancy McWilliams reminds us “The goal is not to eliminate defenses, but to have more flexible ones.” Psychological health is not the absence of coping mechanisms or vulnerability. It is the capacity to respond to life with greater flexibility, awareness, and choice rather than becoming rigidly organized around fear, shame, or identity labels.
You Are A Whole Person
From a psychodynamic perspective, symptoms do not emerge in a vacuum.
They often develop in relationship to stress, attachment experiences, environments, defenses, nervous system adaptation, loss or overwhelm. Sometimes it is an attempt to or to survive emotionally difficult situations Symptoms are not random character flaws but most often are meaningful adaptations. Trauma researcher Bessel van der Kolk writes, “Being able to feel safe with other people is probably the single most important aspect of mental health.” Many symptoms we reduce to diagnostic language are deeply relational at their core. The nervous system adapts to environments, relationships, stress, and perceived safety over time. Creating deeply held beliefs about the world.
For example, hypervigilance may once have protected someone in an unpredictable environment but later on leads to someone isolating themselves or having social anxiety.
Emotional withdrawal may once have reduced overwhelm but over time teaches the person they have to stay small, not express a controversial opinion in order to stay safe and accepted.
Perfectionism may have developed around fears of criticism or rejection as a result of repeated negative feedback from others who had no patience or were putting on them their own fears and self criticisms they refuse to examine for themselves.
The good news is that when we slow down, become curious and seek first to uderstandi before judging themselves or others and shift to exploring these patterns with compassion can help reduce shame without collapsing the entire self into a diagnosis. This honors the reality that you are a person with a mind, body, history, nervous system, relationships, defenses, strengths, and an unfolding story.

Modern culture increasingly encourages people to speak about themselves through diagnostic language and labels in general. Social media in particular often rewards identity-based mental health content because it creates belonging and instant, but shallow recognition. Again, the desire for belonging is deeply human but we can’t truly belong with anyone or any group without first deeply knowing ourselves from the inside out.
Thus let’s focus again on the fact that there is a difference between “this describes part of my experience” and “this is who I am.” One invites understanding first of self then of others.
The other risks confinement, and shallow confusing explanation of behaviors. Healing requires flexibility, curiosity, and the ability to imagine oneself beyond current patterns and usually the current labels naturally change. This process of change and healing becomes harder when the label itself becomes psychologically central.
The Both And
True mental health awareness is not about pretending diagnoses do not exist. I reference the DSM all the time to find a map of what MIGHT be happening for my clients. I have to keep in mind that people are larger than the language used to describe their struggles. A diagnosis may help explain your experience and does often help to guide treatment and reduce shame but needs to be held lightly.
Thus, you are not your diagnosis. If you have a diagnosis remember, you are a human being experiencing patterns that deserve understanding, compassion, and support, but it doesn’t have to be “who you are” fundamentally. People are always more complex—and more capable of growth—than any manual could ever fully describe. So next time you think about introducing yourself as a label remember, once that label is received the listener is the one who gets to define it, not you.
Your story is larger than any label; if you’re ready to explore the unique terrain of your own mind with curiosity and compassion, I invite you to book a call with me to begin our work together.”

References & Further Reading
McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life (3rd ed.). PuddleDancer Press.
Many of the books referenced here have deeply shaped my professional lens and continue to inform my work as a therapist.
Some links may be affiliate links, meaning I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.
